I’m finding the English style wedding a little hard to get a firm grasp on. I mean, the differences I speak of are no big deal, but just enough to make me feel…a little like we’re speaking a different language.
I may have already mentioned that in England, one can only get married in daylight hours. I can’t find the reason for this, but I’m sure there’s some charming history behind it. I kinda like the thought of a night wedding, but okay.
Next comes the confusion of the reception for me. In England it is called the “wedding breakfast”. This is apparently because people once got married first thing in the morning, then everyone had breakfast. Cool. The thing I can’t seem to come to an easy understanding with the venue rep’s about is our concept about what a modern-day reception entails.
Where I’m from a wedding goes like this: guests come to ceremony, then go to reception hall where they eat a meal, dance and mingle until everyone goes home. Basically, you either come or you don’t. It’s a package deal. In much of Europe, it doesn’t necessarily work that way. Here it is customary (to varying extents, depending on country/region) to divide the day into several parts – guests may be invited to different combinations of those parts. There’s the ceremony, cocktails, dinner, after party. I am not into the idea of just inviting someone to the cocktails or late party, particularly as no one is local for me of course. Who wants to come all the way to England for just cocktails? I do understand that the upside is that this allows you to include everyone you want to participate in your day somehow, even if you can’t afford/don’t have room to feed them all dinner.
For obvious reasons, Del and I are going for the all-or-nothing invitation, but here’s the thing: the English wedding professionals don’t seem able/willing to grasp a wedding that is put on that way. They keep trying to force us into dividing the reception itself into two separate parties, although there’s not really sufficient time to do so. (Hello. Can anyone say “money-making” issue?)
Most venues try to make you purchase not only a full meal, but also a 2nd buffet-style offering for later in the night. I get that the concept is that the party will go very late night and include more people. They will want to eat (or eat again). But the ridiculous thing (to me) is that few of these places let you use the venue past 1am! We’re not even going to finish eating until 9PM or so. Nor are we having extra guests join after. As my guest, would you really want to eat a full sit-down meal, then eat again before 1am? I wouldn’t. Even the huge, elaborate Spanish wedding I went to in September – which went on until 5am – only served coffee and pastries and I’d never even seen that before. These came at about 2am, and I found it to be very generous. I would have turned green at the thought of more proper food.
So anyway, no matter how many times Del and I go over with the venue reps what we’re doing they keep saying, “and what would you like to serve your guests later?” It’s one of those moments where I feel like we’re having two separate conversations, although contrary to when that happens in Belgium, we are speaking the same language! It seems that the English wedding industry let go of the traditional wedding schedule, but not the traditional sales. Grrr!
Update: I had only just finished this post when I finally received the estimate for our “wedding breakfast”. Even though I’ve been through the details several times with the rep (having sent an email repeating our plan just yesterday), the estimate came back including an “evening party” with 40 additional guests and a 2nd meal – at $26 per head. I think gave myself a bald spot with all the pulling. Curses!